OPP model could make policing an election issue

Obscenely high and unsustainable policing costs. OPP bills are destroying communities its officers are supposed to protect. Apparent self-interest is cloaked in the guise of public safety needs. Where is the political outrage while OPP costs continue to climb? Who is going to bring policing costs in this province under control?

OPP model could make policing an election issue

Postby Thomas » Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:23 pm

The Ontario Provincial Police – the Walmart of law enforcement – is rolling back its prices starting in January.

The OPP came up with a new funding model, which it introduced last week at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario annual meeting in London.

Northumberland County Warden Linda Thompson said she anticipates a net decrease in costs locally once the proposal is introduced Jan. 1, 2015. However, there has been mixed reaction from the 324 municipalities who contract police service from the provincial force. The Ontario government is hoping the new funding model will make costs fairer and more transparent.

The old system was based on an uneven formula where some municipalities paid as little as $9 per household and others were paying upwards of $1,000 per household, based on varying levels of service.

Under the proposed new system, the bill is split into a basic service, which makes up about 60% of the bill. All municipalities will pay a flat fee per household and business. While no figures are final, the amount is estimated to be about $355. This will cover patrols, crime prevention, operational costs, training, administrative duties and other standard legislative items.

The remaining 40% is unknown. It will cover costs associated with violent crimes, break-ins, other criminal activity, like drug related investigation, statues, traffic and security details. And, none of this includes overtime, cleaning costs, caretaking, accommodations, or other enhanced services beyond patrols.

Sadly, municipal leaders, like Thompson, are being swept up in the glow of the new formula. It looks a lot better because the base costs per household will be more equitable between municipalities and it is a set cost for the municipal budgets.

However, like a Walmart sale, the low price is meant to attract shoppers and distract consumers from the cost of other items. When the final bill comes in it will be other associated costs where there is the potential to go through the roof.

If one reads the literature distributed publicly to municipalities and citizens, all the basic service really covers are patrols in terms of citizen safety. Every other service continues to be user pay, similar to the previous system.

Every time there is a domestic abuse, it will cost. Every time something is stolen from a person’s property, it will cost. Every time there is an accident, the investigating officers will charge the municipality. Then, there are the other things, like drug enforcement or criminal investigations and so forth. If you are having a parade and want officers to direct traffic, it will cost. It is really hard to tell where the cost savings are going to come from.

Yes, there is more equity in the system in the context of the base cost. And the Ontario government is right when it will be able to claim the system is more transparent.

But will municipalities suddenly start to balk at skyrocketing variable costs – that 40%. A rash of break-ins, a series of grow ops spring up, a bad winter with lots of accidents could end up costing municipalities big bucks and throw off budget planning as it has in the past.

Also, some municipalities where there are a lot of cottagers will face stiff opposition to paying the base cost when they are not receiving service for a majority of the year. For municipalities, like those in Northumberland, where there are more people living and might be a bit more urbanized or closer to urban centres, the demand for non-basic service might be a lot higher due to the types of crimes.

The new model is meant to give municipalities more input on levels of service.

In the worst case, municipal politicians could start picking services like a buffet – fewer speed traps, fewer investigations, and so forth.

Certainly there are standards, statues and laws that will be enforced. The police have a responsibility to enforce all laws. Yet miserly councils will be looking to save every penny - but at what cost to local service. This should be raise alarm bells for taxpayers in the future.

This will certainly foist policing back into the spotlight, potentially making it an issue on the campaign trail for the fall election. Who will be first to suggest a regional police force for Northumberland? It is one that will definitely get all sides arguing pretty quickly.

Robert Washburn is a professor of e-journalism at Loyalist College. He can be reached at www.consider-this.ca . This column and others are archived online at http://considerthis.onlinedemocracy.ca.

http://www.northumberlandtoday.com/2014 ... tion-issue
Thomas, Administrator

User avatar
Thomas
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:18 pm
Location: Canada

Return to Unsustainable Policing Costs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests